B2B Challenges

Reduce the carbon footprint of large emails

A 30 MB email generates 145g of CO₂ in complete lifecycle. FileVert reduces this impact by 99.8% through temporary storage and optimized infrastructure.

Hidden critical impact

An email with attachment stored long-term emits 400× more CO₂ than an equivalent FileVert link.

Challenge

The carbon impact of email is massive and largely invisible. In Europe, each message generates approximately 19 g of CO₂, attachments multiply this impact. Millions of large emails travel through our infrastructures daily. FileVert: measured transfer, ephemeral, hosted in Europe, renewable energies.

The true carbon cost of emails with heavy attachments

Hidden pollution of heavy emails: 145g CO₂ for 30 MB in complete lifecycle (based on real architecture vs ADEME theoretical calculations). 400× more than an equivalent FileVert link.

Emails = complete copies

30 MB email = 145g CO₂ (complete cycle: sending + 4-year storage + redundancy) vs 0.36g FileVert

Unlimited cloud storage

0.24 g CO₂e/GB/year (ADEME Base Carbone) + perpetual accumulation = carbon explosion

Non-optimized servers

PUE 1.8 vs 1.2 FileVert + non-renewable energy mix

Lack of alternative awareness

No visibility on real impact of transfer methods

Discover how FileVert reduces carbon impact by 99.8%

Through heavy email alternative and intelligent temporary storage

REAL CARBON IMPACT vs OFFICIAL ESTIMATES

💡 At FileVert, we use a methodology based on real architecture of modern email systems to calculate your true carbon savings.

Methodological comparison:
~0.11g CO₂
Simple ADEME email
(without complete infrastructure)
145g CO₂
30MB complete cycle email
(real 4-year infrastructure)
Different
methodologies
(usage vs infrastructure)
The problem with official figures

ADEME/NégaOctet estimates attribute 92% of the impact of an email to the depreciation of manufacturing computers that send and receive it, and only 0.5% to storage ¹.

Result: An email is counted as having the same impact as using your PC, completely ignoring cloud infrastructure.

The ignored technical reality

What these calculations omit:

  • Massive redundancy: 5-20 copies per file ²
  • 24/7 infrastructure: Servers, cooling, network
  • Overcapacity: Datacenters sized for peaks
  • Geographic replication: Multiple copies
Why this minimization?

Current regulatory frameworks struggle to cover transnational hyperscale infrastructures, which can lead to a transfer of responsibility to users rather than infrastructure ³.

Clarification: ADEME methodologies focus on user usage (0.11g for simple email), while our calculation includes complete real infrastructure over storage duration.

These methodological differences highlight the complexity of measuring digital impact and the importance of transparency.

Sources

[1] Basile Fighiera, NégaOctet expert, detailed analysis on Sami.eco (2022)

[2] HelloCarbo.com (2023): "An email can be duplicated up to 20 times on different servers"

[3] ADEME-Arcep Study, Ministries of Ecological Transition and Economy (2020-2022)

Carbon impact comparison

Email with attachment

30 MB stored 4 years

145g CO₂

Cloud storage

1 GB stored 1 year

500g CO₂

FileVert link

30 MB stored 2 days

0.36g CO₂

Impact reduction

Per transfer

-99.8%

Concrete solutions

Related FileVert Solutions

Concrete features to drastically reduce your carbon footprint

Measured Carbon Impact

Carbon footprint estimation calculator with 98.7% reduction vs competitors.

Learn more

Immediate Deletion

Scheduled deletion of your files after expiration, ensuring no data remains stored.

Learn more

Admin Dashboard

Centralized dashboard for data governance with global activity overview, reports and permission control.

Learn more

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about email carbon impact and ecological alternatives

Complete lifecycle calculation (4-year average storage): initial sending (~4g), 30 MB server storage × 4 years × 0.5 kg CO₂/GB/year = ~60g, 5-20 copy redundancy (~60g), 24/7 infrastructure (servers, cooling, network = ~20g), datacenter overcapacity. Total ~145g CO₂ based on real architecture vs 0.11g ADEME (PC usage only, without cloud infrastructure).
Different methodologies: ADEME = 92% impact attributed to PC manufacturing depreciation (user usage), only 0.5% to storage. FileVert = complete cloud infrastructure included (massive redundancy, long-term storage, 24/7 datacenter). Both are correct in their scope, but ADEME ignores the real infrastructure complexity of modern email systems.
Multi-factor structural reduction: temporary 2-15 day storage vs 4-year emails (99% duration reduction), automatic deletion (no perpetual accumulation), optimized PUE 1.2 vs 1.8 infrastructure, 100% renewable energy France vs fossil mix, no excessive redundancy. Result: 30 MB FileVert = 0.36g CO₂ vs 145g email.
Yes, average lifespan: Gmail keeps indefinitely (users keep emails 4-10 years on average), Outlook same with multi-device sync, 5-20 copy geographic redundancy per file, active 24/7 storage even for unconsulted files. Perpetual accumulation vs FileVert automatic 2-15 day deletion.
Yes but different scopes: ADEME measures user usage (marginal impact of one additional email on existing infrastructure), FileVert measures complete real infrastructure (total cost including storage, redundancy, datacenter). Both valid according to objective: usage awareness (ADEME) vs real infrastructure savings (FileVert). Methodological transparency essential.
FileVert workflow: upload 30 MB file to platform, generate sharing link, send lightweight link by email (~0.01g CO₂), recipient downloads via link, automatic deletion after 2-15 days. Total 0.36g CO₂ vs 145g classic email. Gain: 99.8% reduction + increased security + traceability.
Yes, complete methodology: server manufacturing depreciation over lifespan, network and cooling infrastructure, datacenter electrical consumption (PUE 1.2), 100% renewable energy mix France. Documented Scope 1, 2 and 3. Difference: infrastructure optimization (short storage duration) vs emails (unoptimized perpetual accumulation).
Total transparency: detailed public methodology on site, cited scientific sources (NégaOctet, HelloCarbo, ADEME-Arcep), verifiable infrastructure data (Scaleway PUE, renewable energy), carbon calculator available for personalized simulation. Transparency commitment vs competitor black boxes.

Reduce your email carbon footprint by 99.8%

With FileVert: ecological alternative to heavy emails

99.8% reduction · Temporary storage · 100% renewables