B2B Challenges

Large file transfers: 4 structural market challenges

Companies use general-purpose cloud infrastructure for their large file transfers.

Market challenge

A large majority of companies use general-purpose tools for a specific need.

Challenge

The large file transfer sector concentrates 4 structural issues: technical over-dimensioning (global infrastructure for local needs), strategic dependency (US hyperscaler concentration), difficult CSR compliance (opaque carbon reporting), uncertain sovereignty (multi-region data). FileVert offers a specialized solution that addresses these challenges with infrastructure at the scale of need, an independent EU-based alternative, total energy transparency and guaranteed France sovereignty.

4 structural sector challenges

Academic sources: MIT Press, Carnegie Mellon, ACEEE. Analysis of general-purpose cloud infrastructure

Global infrastructure for local needs

Problem:

Global infrastructure for local transfers

Data:

Multi-region replication for a Paris-Lyon transfer

Source: MIT Press, Carnegie Mellon

Strategic dependency

Problem:

Concentration on US hyperscalers

Data:

69% of organizations exceed their cloud budget (Gartner 2024)

Source: Gartner 2024

Difficult CSR compliance

Problem:

Opaque Scope 3 carbon reporting

Data:

Non-transparent energy mixes

Source: ACEEE, CSRD 2024

Uncertain sovereignty

Problem:

Multi-region data, unclear jurisdiction

Data:

Extraterritorial laws, unclear jurisdiction

Source: Cloud Act, GDPR

FileVert's positioning on these structural challenges

FileVert relies on sovereign European hosting with measurable and published energy transparency to provide a clear positioning on these challenges.

Infrastructure at the scale of need

Positioning:

Relies on hosting without unnecessary global redundancy

Benefit:

Reduced carbon impact and costs

Proof:

France hosting, no multi-region replication

Independent European positioning

Positioning:

Relies on European hosting without vendor lock-in

Benefit:

Reduced strategic dependency

Proof:

European hosting, independence from US hyperscalers

Measurable and published energy transparency

Positioning:

Relies on a host publishing verifiable data

Benefit:

Facilitated CSR compliance

Proof:

Data published by the host, accessible without proprietary tools. PUE, CUE, WUE published, transparent Scope 3

Sovereignty guaranteed

Positioning:

Relies on France hosting, native GDPR, no Cloud Act

Benefit:

Mastered compliance ensured

Proof:

France hosting, France data

European alternatives: transparency and sovereignty

European alternatives to hyperscalers are distinguished by their level of documented environmental transparency and legal status, ensuring sovereignty against US extraterritorial laws.

The findings below are from academic, institutional and independent consulting sources. They describe documented methodological and contractual limitations, without prejudging the overall regulatory compliance of the cited providers.

ProviderEnergy mixCarbon indicatorsSovereignty criterionEnvironmental transparency
OVHcloudLocation-based approach (local electricity mix) complemented by market-based (low-carbon energy contracts since November 2023)Average PUE: 1.24 (1.19-1.36 per datacenter). WUE: 0.34 L/kWh. Targets low global CUEN/A (detailed energy efficiency indicators)PUE, WUE, REF published. Methodology certified Bilan Carbone® and GHG Protocol
Scaleway100% wind or hydroelectric energy (Guarantee of Origin)Average PUE: 1.37 (2024). CO₂e emissions scopes 1, 2 and 3 published. Impact in kgCO₂e/hour availableParticipant and consulted by ADEME on PCR Cloud frameworks. Methodology based on ADEME RCPEnvironmental Footprint Calculator (daily data). Transparent methodology co-developed with ADEME. Monthly reports and API available
OutscaleEnergy efficiency optimization. Detailed energy mix not specifiedCarbon Footprint service (electricity, hardware, maintenance, hosting, network). Detailed view per account and serviceSecNumCloud 3.2 qualification (ANSSI). Immunity to extraterritorial laws. Cloud Doctrine at centerCarbon Footprint integrated into Cockpit. Public documented and secure API. Commitment to clarity, consistency and traceability
Cloud TempleNot documentedNot documentedSecNumCloud 3.2 qualification extended (Bare Metal, open source IaaS). ANSSI qualified sovereign cloudCSR commitments mentioned. Environmental indicator details not documented
ExoscaleNot documentedNot documentedADEME RCP participantContribution to ADEME reference framework. Published indicator details not documented

These elements show that, despite existing tools, some data necessary for complete CSRD reporting is not published or remains partially documented. OVHcloud and Scaleway currently publish complete indicators with transparent and verifiable methodology.

Academic and official sources

All data is verifiable and sourced

MIT Press - Cloud Infrastructure Efficiency

Academic

Analysis of cloud infrastructure

Carnegie Mellon - Energy Consumption

Academic

Study on data center energy consumption

ACEEE - Carbon Reporting

Institutional

Carbon reporting standards for digital

Gartner 2024 - Cloud Budget

Market

69% of organizations exceed their cloud budget

Carbone 4 - Cloud infrastructure analysis

Independent consulting

Analysis of cloud infrastructure carbon impacts

Boavizta - Digital footprint calculation

Independent consulting

Digital carbon footprint calculation methodology

ADEME Base Carbone

Institutional

Official database of emission factors

Frequently asked questions

Technical answers on structural sector challenges

The sector concentrates 4 structural issues: (1) Technical over-dimensioning: global infrastructure for local needs, (2) Strategic dependency: 80% of companies on US hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, GCP), (3) Difficult CSR compliance: opaque Scope 3 carbon reporting, non-transparent energy mixes, (4) Uncertain sovereignty: multi-region data, unclear jurisdiction (Cloud Act).
Generic solutions are designed for permanent storage and global redundancy. For a temporary Paris-Lyon transfer, they replicate data across 2-4 regions, creating structural inefficiency. They are not optimized for ephemeral transfers, generate hidden costs and unnecessary carbon impact.
FileVert offers an independent European alternative: French infrastructure (Scaleway DC3/DC5), no vendor lock-in, 100% French sovereign hosting. Unlike US hyperscalers, FileVert guarantees data sovereignty and avoids dependency on a single ecosystem.
FileVert offers total energy transparency: documented carbon calculator (ADEME + 1-byte model), 100% renewable energy mix (Scaleway), ready-to-use CSR/CSRD exports. Unlike hyperscalers where energy mix is opaque, FileVert enables precise Scope 3 reporting and CSRD compliance.
FileVert hosts exclusively in France (Scaleway DC3/DC5), ensuring data never transits outside the EU. No multi-region replication, no applicable Cloud Act, native GDPR. Files are stored temporarily (2-15 days) then automatically deleted, minimizing exposure.
FileVert is a specialized solution for large file transfers, unlike generic solutions (S3, Azure Blob, Drive) designed for permanent storage. Our architecture is optimized for ephemeral transfers: infrastructure scaled to need, no unnecessary global redundancy, automatic deletion.

Known limitations

The comparisons presented are based on data published to date by providers and available independent analyses. Any unpublished data is indicated as such.

Address structural sector challenges

FileVert offers a specialized solution for large file transfers, addressing the 4 identified structural challenges.